Saturday, May 4, 2019

Long Film: Critical Evaluation.


Critical Evaluation:


For our final piece we decided to use long shot film styles to demonstrate the skills we learnt through the course. This style required us to essentially over extend shots that we were taking, for example, If there was a scene with someone riding a horse, instead of it being a quick take to show the passing of time and going from one place to another, it would be a shot that could less a couple of minutes before finally arriving at the destination. This is the style that we chose.
Our topic of choice for the script was something dark as we wanted to delve into the impact of mental health issues on men as I personally believe this isn’t something that comes up in topics as much as it should. Our story followed a young male going back to his flat and not having anyone there for him, he shows clear signs of loneliness and is blatantly ignored by someone he considers his only friend which, on that day sends him over the edge to the point he takes some pills and drink and over doses.
For this we did lots of long extended shots of our main character walking to his room, drinking alcohol and alternatively his friend just ignoring him and enjoying herself watching Netflix and so forth. These shots worked out quite well as we used a canon c100 the shots were in good quality and the angles we chose captured the characters emotions well by getting quite a lot of close-up shots of his face as well as text messages on a mobile phone.
We could have made these shots better though by correcting some of the lighting in the shots as I believe some shots were slightly over exposed or too dark. This was an issue for us as the light boxes that had been ordered hadn’t been the right ones and instead didn’t give off enough light that we ideally had hoped for in the planning process. As we also had to come back and re shoot some scenes, I felt like the continuity was slightly broken by this lighting again as the time of days were slightly different which mean that the amount of light that was let into the room was more than what we had originally.
In preparation for the task we planned out what was going to happen, or what we had hoped was going to happen so that we could ensure it wasn’t going to take longer than expected. The majority of the filming went to plan although we ran into a slight error that the pills, we wanted to use we couldn’t get so we had to improvise with a different bottle by pulling the label off, so it wasn’t an obvious brand within the shot.
Despite the set back of trying to find a new prop everything had gone smoothly for the whole aspect although we had run out of time which meant that we had to plan again to get the rest of the shots done so we had everything we needed to fit within the time frame stated.
As we had to film on 2 different days, when it came to book the equipment for the second session we ran into a big problem. The canon c100 that we had previously used had been fully booked and there were no more available to use which meant we had to use a different camera that wasn’t quite as high a quality which meant in the editing process we had to try and make the scenes looking similar in quality through post edit shots. If we were to do this differently, I would ensure that we had the same camera if we ever had to do multiple shoots again, so we didn’t have to worry about any loss of quality during post production.
Despite the set back we still managed to film in the appropriate style which was a benefit cause despite the loss of film quality, the quality of style was still there.
Another factor that I think could have been improved upon was the use of a shotgun mic for the piece as we ended up using only the cameras inbuilt microphone which I believe didn’t do the film justice, especially with trying to capture the full emotion of the character to try and explore how impactful and scary what our main character was going through. Although we didn’t have a mic attached this wasn’t the end of the world for trying to draw out the emotion of the piece as, in post edit we had the option to add some music over the slower more quieter moments which would be a reflection of the characters thought process and almost help push viewers into the correct direction for really feeling what the character is going through.
I also believe that this style of filming fits the message of the short film well as the long shots almost identify that what he is going through is dragged out and almost over thought which is a reflection in the filming itself. The filming style requires longer than usual shots which I feel can make some pieces almost uncomfortably long which is how I wanted the piece to feel to the viewer, as this is a reflection of the characters thoughts, he’s uncomfortable with what he lives with, everything he does feels longer that it should be which makes it seem like a burden which ultimately makes him not want to be alive anymore.
Overall, the final piece followed the conventions of the style we chose which was a better outcome that what we could have hoped for as we managed to keep it in the time frame requested, had a story that was quite meaningful and was done with lots of long takes. There are several things I would have liked to changed to get a better final edit but we managed to work with what came out at the end which allowed us to explore this type of cinematography giving us a greater knowledge in this style of filming.

Tuesday, April 30, 2019

Long film final edit


This was the final edit for our long take film. It took quite a lot of time to create as we had to ensure that we followed the styles of the given genre.

Monday, April 8, 2019

Long Film idea

Story:

Student gets home, light background but as he steps into his home the light around gets darker displaying loneliness, he throws his bag into the corner of the room, sits on their bed and begins texting friends just for someone to talk to, but has no response

They call their mother to talk to someone as this is a hard moment and they feel they need comfort to get through it all. but she shoves her off mid call because she is "too busy"

the scene gets a bit darker as the camera gets closer to the character to show the struggled emotions with a blank text screens no replies.

scene cuts

gets up and goes over to the desk and gets a pen and paper and begins writing a suicide note.
character will be crying quietly so no one hears them.

then the person grabs a box of pills, grabs a handful and takes them followed by another cut  showing their friend hearing a thud and not even acknowledging it.

follow her walking past the room her friend has just collapsed in

cut again to a future moment of all her friends looking into the flat room panning out with them all looking into the room

camera pans up with the message: “Place your hand over your heart, can you feel it? That is called purpose. You’re alive for a reason so don’t ever give up.”

Tuesday, December 18, 2018

Film History: First Submission

Assignment 1: Film Essay


Question: Is Melies A Trip to the Moon (1902) a modern, or a primitive film?


1902 was the year that sparked the beginning of a new era for film by none other than Georges Méliès as he released his classic “le voyage dans la lune, or more commonly know as ‘A trip to the moon’. In the eyes of Allissa Wilkinson, the film industry owes a “debt of Gratitude” to Méliès for his influence in the start of science fiction films and the use of special effects. (Wilkinson, 2018) as this led the way for many more voyager films that are still being made to this date. So, do this make his film from 1902 a modern film or that of a primitive one?
To begin with, for its time, Méliès had created a very broad film, opening the film industry as we know it. The film “A trip to the moon” explored cinema in the eyes of creating a reality rather than simply displaying reality like “Lumiere” who was in fact discovering film at the same time. Both had very different visions of the film industry with Lumiere only seeing it last a year where as Méliès believed it was the start of much more as it allowed people to create their own reality as a source of entertainment. This then pushed towards the idea for a trip to the moon as this was the start of a large science fiction era, with his film being “partly inspired by Jules Verne” (Wilkinson, 2018).
During the 20th century was the time for “burgeoning scientific exploration” (Wilkinson, 2018)where mankind was looking at the future of science and travel. This is where Méliès got his ideas for starting to explore these paths of travel through the power of editing and personally I believe this is what makes his film much more modern than primitive.
The word Primitive looks at a more ancient start, something that is related to the start of an evolution. In some aspects it can be seen that “a trip to the moon” is some what primitive due to it beginning the life cycle of voyager style films. It’s a film that is at the beginning of this style allowing newer films to evolve and look beyond the reaches of simply traveling to the moon to more new era times we have films that follow this route of “sci-fi” adventures going beyond the reaches of mars and simply moon traveling to even looking at time differentiated planets in the likes of “interstellar”. It follows the same plot lines –

1.      “(Planning the Trip. Appointing the Explorers and Servants. Farewell.
2.      The Workshops Constructing the Projectile.
3.      The Foundries. The Chimney-stack. The Casting of the Monster Gun/Cannon.
4.      The Astronomers-Scientists Enter the Shell.
5.      Loading the Gun.
6.      The Monster Gun. March Past the Gunners. Fire!!! Saluting the Flag.
7.      The Flight Through Space. Approaching the Moon.
8.      Landing Right in the Moon’s Eye!!!
9.      Flight of the Rocket Shell into the Moon. Appearance of the Earth From the Moon.
10.  The Plain of Craters. Volcanic Eruption.
11.  The Dream of ‘Stars’ (the Bolies, the Great Bear, Phoebus, the Twin Stars, Saturn).
12.  The Snowstorm.
13.  40 Degrees Below Zero. Descent Into a Lunar Crater.
14.  In the Interior of the Moon. The Giant Mushroom Grotto.
15.  Encounter and Fight with the Selenites.
16.  Taken Prisoners!!
17.  The Kingdom of the Moon. The Selenite Army.
18.  The Flight or Escape.
19.  Wild Pursuit.
20.  The Astronomers Find the Shell Again. Departure from the Moon in the Rocket.
21.  The Rocket’s Vertical Drop into Space.
22.  Splashing into the Open Sea.
23.  Submerged At the Bottom of the Ocean.
24.  The Rescue. Return to Port and Land.
25.  Great Fetes and Celebrations.
26.  Crowning and Decorating the Heroes of the Trip.
27.  Procession of Marines and Fire Brigade. Triumphal March Past.
28.  Erection of the Commemorative Statue by the Mayor and Council.
29.  Public Rejoicings.)”
(North, 2010)

New sci-fi exploration films such as interstellar still follow this exact traditional style but with only a few variations. So this does in some way push it more towards a primitive style in the sense that “A trip to the moon” set the path for evolving new sci-fi films, but this is still open to some controversy.

On the other hand, this film can still be seen as a modern style genre film despite its age and lack of length, it has all the context of a modern style sci-fi film just more to the point. Modern is the term used for something that is of relevance to present and recent time and as sci-fi films are more ‘timeless’ that anything, they don’t really have a specific year to classify them as modern in any state of relevance, but I personally believe that this doesn’t stop “a trip to the moon” being a modern style film. We as people class anything advanced in technology to be of our new modern era and as Méliès film follows all the traditions of every sci-fi film that you are likely to find on TV and in Cinema, it still falls under the category as a modern style film if that’s what we see new Sci-fi films as. Méliès pathed the way for science fiction films and, as stated before, the majority of sci-fi films you’ll find follow the traditional style that he lay out, from the beginning, middle, plot line and end. In my own personal opinion, I find this a modern film as, if it was compared to the likes “Martian”, “interstellar” or even “gravity” – a film that slightly strays away from the conventions – “a trip to the moon” has all the modern aspects of these films same story lines, just adjusted for a clearer understanding. Therefore, I believe that Méliès films can still be classed as a modern Era film as it is in a sense ‘timeless’. 
Despite my own opinions it would seem that as Méliès work is continued to be used as a large source of influence it seems the films itself can be classed as something much more primitive as it is still revolutionising the entertainment industry as we know it, Nexus studios have used this same story to display a “new bourgeoning cinematic style of technology” (Wilkinson, 2018)  as they looked into that of 360 degree video and virtual reality whilst making calls back to Méliès styles of film having multiple exposures and disappearing objects among the characters as they make their way “back to the moon” showing a reference to Méliès classic. Due to this “a trip to the moon” can be seen as more of a primitive film despite my own opinions as his early film has set a place for the way we view cinema in a new light as we play back on this film to make away for new cinema, and thanks to Méliès sci-fi films as we know it have come further by using new styles of technology to further envelope us into this world of creativity and entertainment.

Word limit exceeded due to citations, accurate word count – 932 words.

Bibliography

North, D., 2010. Word Press. [Online]
Available at: https://drnorth.wordpress.com/2010/06/10/a-trip-to-the-moon-le-voyage-dans-la-lune/
[Accessed 9 december 2018].

Wilkinson, A., 2018. How Georges Méliès’ films are still influencing cinema, more than 100 years later. [Online]
Available at: https://www.vox.com/culture/2018/5/3/17311222/georges-melies-google-doodle-trip-moon-conquest-pole-effects

Monday, December 3, 2018

Chosen Essay Title:

For my Essay submission i have chosen the question:
  1. Is Méliès’ A Trip to the Moon (1902) a modern, or a primitive film? 
I chose this script as it allows me to look further into "A Trip to the Moon" which was a lecture i really enjoyed due to the advanced nature of this film for its time. 

Saturday, December 1, 2018

Essay Brief:

For my essay i have been given a list of questions to answer based on my knowledge and research of the subject area: 

Answer ONE of the following questions.

  1. Is Méliès’ A Trip to the Moon (1902) a modern, or a primitive film? 
  2. How does German Expressionism use mise-en-scene to suggest psychological states? Use images in your answer.
  3. How has German Expressionist imagery been used contemporary cinema? 
  4. Examine a scene by Sergei Eisenstein. How does this exemplify intellectual/dialectial montage?
  5. Using a specific scene or scenes, explore how Charles Chaplin gave hope to the poor in early 20th century America.
  6. How is Un Chien Andalou (1929) an anti-Hollywood film? 
  7. Examine a scene from Hitchcock’s Blackmail (1929). How is sound used to enhance the drama?   
  8. What colour bring to cinema? Examine with reference to a pre-1960s film.
  9. What did deep focus give to Welles’ Citizen Kane (1941)?
  10. How was French New Wave new? Examine with reference to two key scenes.


Length: 1000 words
Due Date: 17th December 2018, 3:00pm